Cited by 64Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Red Fox Vulpes Vulpes and Pine Marten Martes Martes Food Habits in a Deciduous Forest in Hungary

Open access

Abstract

Feeding habits and interspecific trophic niche overlap of two sympatric predators, the pine marten Martes martes and the red fox Vulpes vulpes, were studied in a deciduous forest habitat in Hungary with conditions of differing abundance and dominance in the rodent community. The main food source of the predators consisted of small mammals, mainly rodents. Consumption of small mammals was higher during bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus dominated years than in Apodemus mice dominated years. Both predators preferred bank voles as prey and consumed less Apodemus mice and shrews (Soricidae) than expected by availability. The two opportunistic predators utilised different, seasonally-dependent food resources. Martens consumed more plants, reptiles, amphibians and fish, whereas foxes consumed more small mammals and ungulate carcasses. In summer and autumn, percent biomass of bank voles in marten diet and Apodemus mice in fox diet was positively correlated with the number of rodents in the available food resources. In winter and spring, the density of rodents varied slightly; therefore, variations in the diets of these two predators were not related to prey density. The prey consumed was characteristically terrestrial and small sized (< 50 g). There was no difference in prey weight distribution between martens and foxes, but martens consumed more arboreal and foxes more terrestrial prey. The standardised food niche breadth did not differ significantly between the two species. Food niche overlap between the two predators was higher in winter and spring, but the difference between seasons was not significant (mean overlap = 72%). In comparison with higher latitudes, we found a larger food niche overlap in our study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13[258:corfvv]2.0.co;2

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Ansorge H., 1991, Abhandlungen und Berichte des Naturkundemuseums Görlitz, 65, 1
  2. Brangi A., 1995, Hystrix, 7, 113
  3. Brändle M., 2002, Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4, 643
  4. Ciampalini B., 1985, Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 50, 226
  5. Clevenger A. P., 1993, Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 58, 212
  6. Englund J., 1965, Viltrevy, 3, 371
  7. Horváth G., 2000, Miscellanea Zoologica Hungarica, 13, 105
  8. Lanszki J., 2003, Folia Zoologica, 52, 367
  9. Lindström E., 1989, Finnish Game Research, 46, 53
  10. Mills M. G. L., 1984, Koedoe, 27, 281
  11. Nasimovich A. A., 1948, Trudy Laplandskogo gasudarstvennogo zapovednika, 3, 81
  12. Pedrini P., 1995, Hystrix, 7, 39
  13. Pedrini P., 1995, Hystrix, 7, 127
  14. Pulliainen E., 1981, Annales Zoologici Fennici, 18, 270
  15. Ruiz-Olmo J., 1991, Mammalia, 55, 639
  16. Sidorovich V. E., 2000, Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 65, 271
  17. Weber J-M., 1994, Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 59, 9
  18. White P. J., 1995, Southwestern Naturalist, 40, 342

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 64

Metadata

Authors
Lanszki, J., Zalewski, A., & Horváth, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Kaposvár (HU)
  • Mammal Research Institute (PL)
  • University of Pecs (HU)
Corresponding author
Zalewski, Andrzej
Venue
Wildlife Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
258-271
ISSN
0909-6396 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2192848163
Cited by
64
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wildlife Biology (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Hungarian Scientific Research Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
red fox, Martes martes, predator diet, trophic niche overlap, small mammal prey, bank vole, deciduous forest, sympatric predators, seasonal diet variation, prey selection, ungulate carcasses, latitudinal gradient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Red Fox Vulpes Vulpes and Pine Marten Martes Martes Food Habits in a Deciduous Forest in Hungary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13%5B258:corfvv%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Lanszki, J., Zalewski, A., & Horváth, G. (2007). Comparison of Red Fox Vulpes Vulpes and Pine Marten Martes Martes Food Habits in a Deciduous Forest in Hungary. Wildlife Biology. https://doi.org/10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13%5B258%3Acorfvv%5D2.0.co%3B2